"I like it when the judge calls me 'honey' - that means he's going to grant my motion." -- Quote from real female attorney I know, circa 1990.
Does the court system discriminate against women lawyers? Could be!!!!
Anyway, that's what a couple of women litigators assume, based on their study showing that men were lead counsel in a sampling of federal cases in northern Illinois from 2013 more often than women were.
According to the study, based on information gained through the PACER federal court electronic filing system, 68 percent of all lawyers appearing in the 2013 civil cases were men, and 32 percent were women. But 76 percent of lead counsel were men, while only 24 percent were women. Men were lead counsel in 78 percent of labor-related lawsuits, and women were leads in only 22 percent.
I get that, I believe that, and it doesn't surprise me that fewer women than men are lead counsel.
Even though women nowadays graduate from law school at about the same rates as men, we still have a lot of lawyers in the profession who came up during the old days when female attorneys were unusual. Of course, that means that, even today, the lawyers with many years of experience will disproportionately be male.
And those super-experienced males are going to tend to be asked to take the lead on big cases. That has nothing to do with "maleness" and a lot to do with experience, reputation, and connections.
Also, in my own unstatistical, purely anecdotal experience, a lot of women find the life of a litigator to be nasty, brutish, and never-ending, not always family-friendly, and who needs it when I can spend time with my kids and make a nice home for my family and work out every day and anyway my husband makes enough money and we don't need a second income?
(And, no, there is nothing wrong with that.)
Even if a woman chooses to stay active in the legal profession, a disproportionate number do not seem to care for the life of a trial lawyer. I know a lot of female lawyers who started out in litigation and transitioned into non-litigation-related areas in the profession (doing very well, I might add). I don't know many guys who have done the same. The women weren't encouraged by their male bosses to move out - in fact, their bosses wanted them to stay - and they didn't leave because judges or opposing counsel called them "honey." According to what they said to me, they left because they didn't like being in "adversarial mode" all the time. Or because they had a better opportunity - for example, an in-house position.
Maybe it's different with younger women coming out of law school (I don't know), but even if so, those younger women are too inexperienced right now to be lead counsel on much of anything other than an unemployment claim.
Some of the steps recommended at the end of the study seem to be good ideas - encouraging new attorneys to take pro bono cases, learn to develop the "grit" necessary to handle defeats and use them as learning experiences, learn to present themselves well in a courtroom setting. But it annoys the heck out of me when people immediately assume, without any evidence apart from the disparity, that gender disparities are a result of bias.
"Disparity" does not necessarily equal "discrimination."
Details of the study are below the jump.
The study was based on a review of names (and, where names were ambiguous, web bios) of counsel of record in a sampling of civil and criminal cases filed in 2013 with the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The study was led by attorneys Stephanie Scharf and Bobbi Liebenberg, and was sponsored by the American Bar Foundation and the Commission on Women in the Profession of the American Bar Association. (Thanks to Bloomberg BNA for providing a link to the study.) Although the study analyzed the numbers, it did not attempt to empirically determine why the disparity existed. The discussion in the study about implicit bias against women trial lawyers appeared to be nothing more than the opinions of the authors based, presumably, on their own anecdotal experience and what they'd been told by others.
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010