Nothing, but here is my stab at it.
I’ve been racking my brain to find some employment-law-related excuse to blog about Prince Harry and his book Spare, which I have not read and do not intend to read, out of respect for his late grandmum.
Alas, hard as I've tried, I have been unable to think of a single employment-related tie-in.
Fortunately, though, the creativity of Callum Borchers of the Wall Street Journal is far superior to my own. In “When It’s Time to Pull a Prince Harry and Burn That Bridge,” Mr. Borchers analogizes what the Duke of Sussex has done in Spare to burning one's bridges on the job. (The WSJ is heavily paywalled, so the link may not work if you don't have a paid subscription.) Mr. Borchers argues that burning one’s bridges at work is sometimes a fine thing, contrary to the advice that your parents probably gave you.
According to Mr. Borchers, “[S]etting old ties ablaze can advance a career or, at least, won’t stall one.” He says that the Duke of Sussex views himself as a "whistleblower" on the Royal Family, "revealing flaws in the British monarchy and sharing the mental toll of royal life, including panic attacks and substance abuse." And, look, now he has [had a "ghost" write for him] a best seller!
But most of the column consists of anecdotes about regular people who left their jobs "on bad terms" and weren't sorry about it. They blew the whistle on sexual harassment or a toxic workplace culture on their way out the door, they accepted a job but at the last minute decided not to take it, they quit abruptly. (Does "quitting abruptly" means giving only one week's notice instead of two?)
As "bridge-burners," these anecdotes left me cold. They're so tame! At least, they're nothing like publicly bad-mouthing your dad (the KING!!!), your stepmother, your only brother, and your sister-in-law, and letting the world know that you got a funny feeling when your late mother’s brand of lip cream was used to soothe your frostbitten . . . well, you know.
(Gee, for someone who hasn’t read the book, Robin sure seems to know a lot about it, doesn’t she?)
Anyway, back to burning bridges in the workplace. The commenters to Mr. Borchers' column generally did not agree that burning one’s bridges on the job was a good thing, which restored my faith in humanity. Sometimes Mummy and Daddy know best. And one comment was so good that I thought it deserved a column of its own. This is from commenter Raul Campos, my new hero:
After working for 11 companies over a 47-year career, I retired last month, having burned no bridges despite the usual internal conflicts, personality differences, and poor treatment that I occasionally had to endure. I emerged from the daily grind with incredible friendships and excellent client memories. The key for me was to follow three essential rules: 1. Never judge other people – what I learned early in my career is that it takes time to learn who someone is, and what that person is capable of achieving. Judging people only limits your ability to collaborate with others and work effectively with clients. 2.Always forgive anyone who has offended you – the burden of carrying that anger, however justified, against another is debilitating and counterproductive. 3. Love your coworkers, boss, and clients – this is not always easy, but we are all humans, and if we can truly love who we are, despite our flaws, we can always find it possible to love others despite their flaws. I have also witnessed during my long career that people who burn bridges at work often do the same with friends and family and suffer greatly for doing so. If I could start over, I would add one more rule to my list – always be kind and learn to recognize the suffering of your colleagues, bosses, and clients.
(Emphasis is mine.)
Wow. What a guy. My new year's resolution is to be Raoul, not Harry.
Image Credits: From flickr. Photo of Queen Elizabeth, Meghan Markle, and Prince Harry (2020) in the Public Domain. Photo of Princess Di and then-Prince Charles (1981) by Joe Haupt, Creative Commons license.
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010