How can I sue thee? Let me count the ways.
Last week, I talked about five very basic things employers do to get themselves embroiled in employment litigation. They were
- Discrimination (not only unlawful discrimination, but also favoritism and nepotism, which are legal but are likely to lead to charges and lawsuits because of the perceived unfairness)
- Failure to consider or make reasonable accommodations
- Failure to audit for or address pay inequity
- Failure to offer current harassment training or to properly handle harassment complaints
- Medical leave mishaps.
But I promised you 10, so here are the other five examples of unhealthy practices that are likely to get you named as a defendant in a lawsuit:
No. 6: Messing with employees' pay. This is usually not deliberate. Wage and hour laws, including wage payment laws, are varied and complex. It's easy to make a mistake, even if you are trying to do the right thing. Most states have wage payment laws that require employees to be paid at certain times, and specify the deadline for making final payment to terminated employees. Under many state laws, "wages" includes not only an employee's regular pay, but also accrued and unused vacation or Paid Time Off, bonuses, and commissions. Depending on the state you are in, your employees may not necessarily "forfeit" these types of compensation unless you have a specific written policy providing for that. For a multi-state employer, state wage and hour laws can make the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (which requires you to pay the $7.25/hour minimum wage and overtime to non-exempt employees, and to comply with child labor laws), look like a walk in the park.
Naw, just kidding. Under the FLSA, you could be misclassifying your non-exempt employees as "exempt," misclassifying your employees as "independent contractors," making improper deductions that bring your non-exempt employees' pay below the minimum wage, failing to capture "hours worked" by non-exempt employees who telecommute or do business while driving to and from the workplace, and failing to compensate properly for non-exempt employees' travel and training time.
No. 7: Shooting yourself in the foot with terminated employees. You finally managed to unload that nightmare of an employee. Can you relax now? No. Will you offer a separation agreement with a release of claims, or will you take your chances? If you do offer an agreement, and if your ex-employee is 40 or older, does the agreement comply with the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act? If not, you won't have a valid waiver of federal age discrimination claims.
And whether you offer an agreement or not, are you going to fight on unemployment, or will you stand down? My own philosophy is "Stand down unless the ex is evil -- a thief, a sexual or racial harasser, or violent." If the former employee is a poor performer or had bad attendance, you are likely to lose on the claim anyway, and the employee is less likely to sue you if you don't try to scorch the earth.
And how about references? Some states have "anti-blacklisting" statutes that limit what employers can say and/or how they can say it. Even if your state doesn't, you can be liable for defamation if you aren't very careful about what you say about an ex-employee.
It's also not unheard of for a former employee to sue an employer for discrimination or retaliation based on the employer's post-termination conduct.
No. 8: Not staying up on legal marijuana laws. You've had a "zero tolerance" policy for illegal drugs -- including marijuana -- for the past 30 years. If an applicant or employee tests positive, out they go, no exceptions. This doesn't violate federal law, but it may very well violate state law depending on which state you're in. Let's say you're in a state that has legalized medical marijuana and also has a state disability-rights statute. An applicant tests positive on her post-offer drug test for marijuana and presents a valid medical marijuana card, plus a doctor's note saying that she has been prescribed medical marijuana for her glaucoma. You withdraw the job offer based on your "zero-tolerance" policy. You may have violated your state disability law, assuming glaucoma would be considered a "disability" under that law.
As of now, medical marijuana is legal in more states than it is not. So even if you're in one of the few states where medical marijuana is illegal, keep up with the law and be prepared to make some big changes to the ways you've been dealing with marijuana since drug testing became common.
(As already noted, marijuana is still an illegal drug under federal law, and there is no protection under the Americans with Disabilities Act for current users of illegal drugs. Also, if you are an employer who is governed by federal law -- for example, a trucking company governed by regulations of the U.S. Department of Transportation -- you can continue to comply with your federal requirements relating to marijuana, regardless of what your state law says. But only with the employees who are actually subject to those requirements.)
No. 9: Putting your older employees out to pasture. The federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act protects applicants and employees who are 40 years old or older, and there is no upper limit. (Yes, you could theoretically be liable for firing a 90-year-old employee if the employee could show that he was fired because of his age.) Age discrimination also violates many state fair employment practices laws. And don't think it's a defense to an age discrimination claim that you have a ton of 40-year-olds even though you require everybody to retire at age 55. Discriminating based on age within the protected age group is also unlawful.
Beware of age-based "microaggressions," which seem to be pretty common these days and can be evidence of a discriminatory motive. For example, indicating a preference for "digital natives" (people who are young enough to have spent their whole conscious lives with computers), saying "you can't teach an old dog new tricks," talking about how your company really needs "new blood," or pestering an older employee to tell you when she plans to retire.
And, finally, go back to No. 7 and read what I said about separation agreements that comply with the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act.
No. 10: Getting even with your "squeaky wheels." As I noted last week, retaliation violates just about every employment law that exists. It is very human and natural to be upset when an employee complains internally, not to mention when he files a charge, or testifies against you or cooperates in a government investigation of your company. If any of these things happens and the employee is still working for you, consult with your lawyer before taking any disciplinary action against the employee or -- heaven forbid -- terminating the employee. Heck, consult with your lawyer if you doubt your ability to carry on at work as if nothing had happened. Even if the employee was mistaken, he's still protected as long as he acted in good faith.
Those are my top 10, but I'm sure I missed some. Feel free to add to my list in the comments!
Image Credits: From flickr, Creative Commons license. Cigarette butts by Rosewoman, drunk poster by Retrogasm, man jaywalking in traffic in downtown Chicago by Britt Fuller (public domain).
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010