Miss Manners should stick to writing about ice cream forks.
Those of you who read this blog know that I am a longtime fan of the etiquette columnist Judith Martin, aka "Miss Manners," in the Washington Post. I have even been known to borrow her style for a few of my blog posts.
Unfortunately, Ms. Martin is handing over much of her column now to her progeny, Nicholas and Jacobina, and -- oh, dear, I'm afraid it just isn't the same.
Anyway, either she or her kids (I'm gonna blame the kids) committed a faux pas last Saturday in responding to a letter that will be of interest to employers.
The letter writer said that her boss texts her about work at all hours. "Eventually, I started blocking him as I clocked out and unblocking him as I clocked in . . .. But I'm worried about being considered delinquent . . .. What is your advice?"
This letter writer didn't ask me, but I would have said that she is doing exactly the right thing. She says she's hourly, which almost certainly means non-exempt under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Her boss should thank his lucky stars that she waits until the next business day to respond to the texts. Because of her good instincts, he won't someday be hit with an off-clock work claim.
But what did Miss Manners' kids say? First, they make no mention at all of the FLSA, or off-clock work. Instead, they suggest that the letter writer tell her boss,
"I am afraid that I am only available each week during the paid hours for which I am contracted. However, I would certainly be happy to discuss more extended, salaried employment if that is what you require."
Yeah, that should work. Not.
First, if the letter writer actually said this to her boss, she would probably be fired for insubordination. Nobody except a valet on Downton Abbey talks this way unironically.
But more importantly, "salaried" does not equal "non-exempt." For example, an administrative assistant is usually paid a salary but is also non-exempt, meaning he or she is entitled to overtime pay for working more than 40 hours in a single workweek. Thus, if the letter writer gives up her quiet evenings and mornings in exchange for only a "salary," she will be getting ripped off. As some of Miss Manners' commenters noted, switching to a mere "salary" probably means that the letter writer will be expected to answer the boss's after-hours texts . . . and without the benefit of any extra pay.
And the boss won't be safe, either, because someday the letter writer might realize that she's still non-exempt even though she's paid a "salary," and then she can sock him with a lawsuit for off-clock work and unpaid overtime.
To be not just salaried but actually exempt from overtime under the "white-collar" administrative-executive-professional exemptions, an employee must generally (1) be paid on a "salary basis," (2) be paid at least the applicable minimum of $684 a week, and (3) satisfy what are called the "duties tests" for one of these exemptions. (A bona fide practitioner of law or medicine, or a bona fide teacher, can be paid by the hour and can earn less than $684 a week while staying exempt.) Getting a "salary" is a good start on the road to exemption, but there's still a long way to go.
Miss Manners's kids also missed a lovely opportunity to warn supervisors and managers that their uncouthness can have legal consequences and cost money. If they call, email, or text their non-exempt employees after hours, and if the employees read and reply, that is time worked, which almost* always has to be paid. If that extra time puts the employees over 40 hours for the week, then they get time and a half.
Several commenters to the "Miss Manners" column mentioned that supervisors often send emails or texts after hours because they're afraid they'll forget if they wait until morning. I know from my own experience that this can be true. But here are a few work-arounds:
- Write your message while you're thinking about it, but save it to your "Drafts" folder until business hours.
- Write your message while you're thinking about it, but delay the "send" until business hours.
- Write your message on a sheet of paper while you're thinking about it, put it in the pocket of the shirt you plan to wear to work the next day, and pull the paper out of your pocket and talk to your assistant about it during business hours.
- Write your message on your hand while you're thinking about it so you'll have it right there when you get to work. (Only downside -- unless you use indelible ink, you may have to wait until after you take your shower, and by then you may have forgotten what you wanted to say.)
- Write your message while you're thinking about it and send it, but put in the Subject line, "CAN WAIT UNTIL TOMORROW." If it's a text, make that the first four words of the text message.
- Send a "note to self" in an app like Apple Reminders or Outlook calendar. When you get the alert the next day, you will remember to discuss it with your assistant.
- Apologetically tell your assistant that you have an unfortunate habit of sending messages at any hour, that you have no desire to disturb her peace [or pay overtime], and that you would be most grateful if she blocked your messages and refrained from checking email during non-working hours.
One other tip for supervisors and managers: If you want to comply with the FLSA (and you should), beware of your very best non-exempt employees. They're the ones who are most likely to consider extra off-clock time to be "no big deal, glad to do it" and to think it's silly and nitpicky to post every minute of work. Make sure they understand that you really, no really, want them to post all the time that they work, even if it's only 15 minutes' worth to read and reply to an email at 8 p.m. You may have to tell them this a few times before they realize you are serious. (Bless their dedicated, team-playing little hearts.)
*In some jurisdictions, work time that is truly trivial -- say, a couple of minutes -- may not have to be paid.
THE MORAL OF THIS POST: Go to "Miss Manners" to find out whether COVID is an excuse for failing to send handwritten thank-you notes, but not for employment law information. (Gee, she was so much better last summer.)
Image Credits: Photo of Miss Manners' book from flickr, Creative Commons license, by Kristian Bjornard. All others from Adobe Stock.
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010