Who can negotiate on his behalf?
Baltimore Ravens quarterback Lamar Jackson is one of the most skilled and exciting players in the National Football League. In 2019, he threw for 36 touchdowns and ran for seven more on his way to the Most Valuable Player award and has continued to thrive when not slowed by injuries. Consequently, Mr. Jackson’s employment status is of considerable interest.
Recent developments in Mr. Jackson’s employment have highlighted the role of the NFL Players Association in accordance with the National Labor Relations Act.
Jackson’s rookie contract
Mr. Jackson was drafted by the Ravens with the fifth overall pick in the 2018 NFL Draft. He subsequently signed a four-year contract worth $9.47 million, approximately $8 million of which was guaranteed. The contract also included a fifth-year option, solely within the club’s discretion. The length of the contract (including the option) was pre-determined by the collective bargaining agreement between the NFL and NFLPA. The salary amounts were effectively pre-determined by the collective bargaining agreement, which had limitations on compensation in rookie contracts.
Before the 2021 season, according to the deadline required by the collective bargaining agreement, the Ravens exercised their fifth year option on Mr. Jackson (for 2022). The collective bargaining agreement also required that Mr. Jackson be paid a salary equal to the average salary of the 10 highest-paid quarterbacks for the 2021 season (known as the “Transition Tender”), which was $23 million.
Before the 2022 season, the Ravens began negotiations with Mr. Jackson about a long-term contract extension. However, negotiations were complicated by the contract recently signed by another quarterback, Deshaun Watson. Mr. Watson signed a five-year, fully guaranteed $230 million contract with the Cleveland Browns in March 2022. Although star players regularly have 50-75 percent of their contract value guaranteed, Mr. Watson’s contract was unprecedented and deviated significantly from historical practices. The Watson contract became more problematic when Mr. Watson was suspended by the league for “sexual assault (as defined by the NFL).” (Mr. Watson has settled lawsuits brought by most of his accusers, and he has denied any wrongdoing.)
Mr. Jackson is generally regarded as a better player than Mr. Watson and thus said that he too wanted a fully guaranteed contract. The Ravens have refused so far.
The Union’s exclusive authority
Mr. Jackson’s situation has been further complicated by the fact that he has been negotiating without an agent, an extremely rare occurrence. This is where the role of the Players Association is important.
Section 9 of the NLRA provides that unions, like the NFLPA, are the “exclusive representatives” of the unionized employees “for purposes of collective bargaining with respect to rates of pay, wages, hours of employment, or other conditions of employment.” In other words, an employer cannot negotiate the terms of a contract with an employee on an individual basis unless the union gives permission.
The NFLPA, like other players’ unions in American sports, delegates some of its exclusive negotiating authority to individuals certified by the union, such as sports agents. To obtain certification from one of these unions requires passing a test on the collective bargaining agreement, passing a background check, and meeting other personal and business-related criteria. The certified agents then must follow the NFLPA’s regulations or risk losing their certifications. These regulations limit an agent’s compensation to 3 percent of a player’s pay, though in practice agents often accept less. Although the news stories of unscrupulous agents are sadly often true, by and large the player agent community is skilled and committed to serving their clients.
To protect its player-members, the Players Association enlists the NFL in helping to enforce its authority under the NLRA. Article 48 of the NFL-NFLPA collective bargaining agreement provides that any contract negotiated with an agent not certified by the NFLPA is void. Further, any club that negotiates with an agent not certified by the NFLPA is subject to a $30,000 fine.
Jackson goes rogue
Mr. Jackson probably chose not to hire an agent to save the fees. Assuming he signed a $200 million contract negotiated by an agent, he would have owed the agent between $2 million and $6 million, based on a 1-3 percent commission range.
Instead of using an agent, Mr. Jackson has received help in his negotiations from Players Association attorneys and contract specialists. This makes sense because the Players Association officials are certainly experts in these matters.
Nevertheless, Mr. Jackson and the Ravens have been unable to reach a new agreement. Last month, the Ravens exercised their right under the collective bargaining agreement to extend Mr. Jackson’s contract through the 2023 season at a value of $32.4 million. There are nuances, but the amount, known as the Franchise Tag, is generally equal to the average salary of the five highest-paid quarterbacks in the NFL. To complicate matters further, Mr. Jackson’s Tag is “non-exclusive,” meaning that he has until July 15 to negotiate a contract with another club. The Ravens would have a right of first refusal.
Now comes Mr. Jackson’s defiance of union authority. He has reportedly considered leaving the Ravens and has authorized a business partner to contact other clubs on his behalf. But the business partner is not an agent certified by the Players Association. The Players Association was displeased with this development and persuaded the NFL to send a memo to its clubs, reminding the clubs that they can negotiate only with certified agents. The memo also instructed the clubs not to engage in discussions with Mr. Jackson’s associate.
***
Mr. Jackson’s situation is not likely to be settled for a while. All parties have dug in their heels. Mr. Jackson would be well advised to retain capable representation, whether that be from the Players Association or from an agent certified by it.
- Senior Counsel
Chris is an attorney with more than thirteen years of experience at law firms, in-house, and in academia, with extensive expertise in sports, litigation, and labor and employment. He represents and advises employers with respect to ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010