Every year, typically in the fall, federal contractors across the nation receive scheduling letters from the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs informing them that they have been selected for compliance reviews. The letters request a wide range of information establishing the contractors' compliance with Executive Order 11246, the Rehabilitation Act and the Vietnam Era Veterans’ Readjustment Assistance Act.
Google’s headquarters received just such a letter on September 30, 2015. Google says that since that time it has provided the OFCCP with “hundreds of thousands of records” showing its compliance with EEO requirements and its affirmative action program. The OFCCP, however, requested more information, including detailed compensation information and names and contact information of Google employees. Google provided job titles and salary histories for the employees as of September 1, 2015, but it refused to provide names and contact information of its employees, or any data for September 1, 2014.
On December 29, 2016, the OFCCP sued Google to get the rest of the information it had requested.
OFCCP, Google sound off
According to Thomas Dowd, acting director of the agency, "Like other federal contractors, Google has a legal obligation to provide relevant information requested in the course of a routine compliance evaluation. Despite many opportunities to provide this information voluntarily, Google has refused to do so. We filed this lawsuit so we can obtain the information we need to complete our evaluation."
In response, a Google spokesperson has said, “We're very committed to our affirmative action obligations and to improving the diversity of our workforce and have been very vocal about the importance of these issues. . . . As a federal contractor, we're familiar with our obligations and have worked collaboratively with the OFCCP. We've worked hard to comply with the OFCCP's current audit and have provided hundreds of thousands of records over the last year, including those related to compensation." Google says the information it has withheld is confidential or subject to overbroad requests.
The lawsuit
According to the OFCCP Complaint, the General Services Administration awarded Google a contract for “Advertising and Integrated Marketing Solutions,” under which Google has received more than $600,000. The Complaint seeks to (1) "permanently enjoin Google from failing or refusing to comply with the requirements of the laws under the OFCCP’s jurisdiction or their attendant regulations"; (2) direct Google to provide the requested information; and (3) in the event Google fails to provide the information or cooperate in the compliance review, cancel Google's federal contract and debar it from future federal contracts.
Focus on equal pay
In recent years, the OFCCP has focused more on equal pay as part of its routine compliance review, which has resulted in requests for compensation data. The typical scheduling letter from the OFCCP requests the following information related to salary and compensation:
Employee level compensation data for all employees (including but not limited to full-time, part-time, contract, per diem or day labor, temporary) as of the date on the workforce analysis of your AAP. Provide gender and race/ethnicity information and hire date for each employee as well as job title, EEO-1 Category and job group in a single file. Provide all requested data electronically, if maintained in an electronic format. (NOTE: Presumably Google would have maintained its data electronically!)a. For all employees, compensation includes base salary and or wage rate, and hours worked in a typical workweek. Other compensation or adjustments to salary such as bonuses, incentives, commissions, merit increases, locality pay or overtime should be identified separately for each employee.
b. You may provide any additional data on factors used to determine employee compensation, such as education, past experience, duty location, performance ratings, department or function, and salary level/band/range/grade.
c. Documentation and policies related to compensation practices of the contractor should also be included in the submission, particularly those that explain the factors and reasoning used to determine has compensation.
Google has stated a desire to find a resolution, but the OFCCP's filing of this lawsuit indicates that those who wish to play in the government’s sandbox must play by the government’s rules. The question is, will Google want (or need) to play?
Image Credit: From flickr, Creative Commons license, by Graham Smith.
- Partner
Kristine is the head of the Winston-Salem office with experience involving every aspect of the employment relationship. She has been involved in complex litigation involving class action issues, the FLSA, all aspects of Title ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010