The Department of Labor has issued new FAQs.
As most of you know, the U.S. Department of Labor has an ever-growing list of FAQs related to the Families First Coronavirus Response Act. The latest FAQs include guidance related to issues that are likely to dominate Human Resources departments this summer.
The new FAQs start at 89 and run through 93. I'll take them in the DOL's order, using the DOL's numbering. The following is only a paraphrase and summary. You can read the real thing here.
89. Do I have to give FFCRA leave to my yard and household workers?
Yes, if they work for you exclusively (for example, a full-time nanny), in which case they would be your employees. No, if they have other clients besides you, or if they work for a company for which you are the customer -- for example, a lawn maintenance or house cleaning service.
90. We're a temporary agency that has 500 or more employees. If our employees are assigned to companies with fewer than 500 employees, what are the employees' FFCRA rights, if any?
Your company does not have to comply with the FFCRA because you have more than 500 employees. The "client" company may or may not have to comply with respect to your employees. If the client is a "joint employer" with you, then it will have to give your employees FFCRA leave if they qualify. The client could be a joint employer if it has the authority to hire or fire your employees, "supervises and controls [their] schedule or conditions of employment, determines [their] rate and method of pay, and maintains [their] employment records."
Although your company is not covered by the FFCRA, you would be prohibited from retaliating against your employees for taking FFCRA leave while on assignment at client companies that were covered.
91. My employees have been teleworking successfully since we all got sent home in March. Now that it's summer, they want FFCRA leave to cultivate their sun tans -- I mean, take care of their kids. But their kids have been out of school since March, and the employees were able to work! Can I ask what's changed, and maybe deny the leave?
Maybe. You need to "exercise caution" in asking about changed circumstances, "lest it increase the likelihood that any decision denying leave based on that information is a prohibited act." (I am not sure what the DOL is getting at here.) And even though your employees have been teleworking since March and seemed to be doing fine, it's possible that they really haven't done a good job with their dual responsibilities, or that a spouse or other caregiver was available to provide child care in the spring but is no longer available for the summer.
On the other hand, if the employee lies to get paid leave for child care -- for example, the employee actually doesn't have any kids or child care responsibilities -- then you can take action against the employee.
92. What kind of documentation can I request when an employee wants FFCRA leave based on having symptoms of COVID-19 and seeking a medical diagnosis?
You can ask for the symptoms and the date of the doctor's appointment. You can't ask for anything else.
93. My employee's kids' school closed in March, with online instruction only. This Friday would have been the last day of school under normal circumstances. The employee has been teleworking but now wants to start taking "school-closing" FFCRA leave, at least on a part-time basis. I say the employee isn't eligible for FFCRA leave as of Monday because school would have been out anyway. Am I right?
Kind of. You are right that the employee wouldn't be entitled to FFCRA leave for school-closing-related reasons if school would have been out in any event. BUT if the kids' summer child care or other summer program is closed (or a summer caregiver is unavailable) because of COVID-19, then the employee would still be entitled to FFCRA leave for the time that he or she couldn't telework.
Image Credits: From flickr, Creative Commons license. Downton Abbey cast by lafiguradelpadre Congreso, mom spraying baby's toy with hose by Cesar Rincon.
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010