Here are 10 questions to help you think it through.
The Americans with Disabilities Act requires, in appropriate circumstances, that employers make reasonable accommodations for employees with disabilities. A common question is whether it is "reasonable" for an employer to let an employee work from home as a reasonable accommodation.
I last wrote about this in 2015, when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held in EEOC v. Ford Motor Company that Ford did not have to allow an employee with severe irritable bowel syndrome to telecommute.
I agreed with the court based on the circumstances of that case, even though I am generally very pro-telecommuting and do it quite a bit of it myself.
On the other hand, most courts say that employers can't simply dismiss outright a request for telework as a reasonable accommodation, and that makes perfect sense, too.
So, let's say an employee comes to you and says that she has a medical condition that requires telecommuting. Here are some questions you should ask:
FIRST STEP: Assess the employee's medical condition and restrictions
The first thing you need to know in assessing a request for telecommuting as a reasonable accommodation is why the employee is asking for it.
No. 1: What exactly is the employee's disability or medical condition, and how does being onsite (at the workplace) affect it? As an employer, you have the right to this information when an employee asks for any ADA accommodation.
No. 2: Does the employee have documentation from a health care provider with expertise in the appropriate field/specialty, confirming both the condition and the provider's opinion that a telecommuting arrangement would be helpful? Although the Family and Medical Leave Act sharply limits employers' ability to get follow-up information or information from providers other than the employee's usual caregiver, the ADA reasonable accommodation process is not nearly so strict. For example, if your employee brings you a note from her chiropractor saying that she needs to telecommute full time because of her irritable bowel syndrome, you would generally have the right under the ADA to send the employee to a gastroenterologist to properly diagnose the IBS and recommend appropriate accommodations. (You -- the employer -- should pay for the visit, and you should also provide the specialist with relevant information about the employee's job duties and work environment.)
No. 3: Do you have an adequate understanding as to what, in the opinion of the employee and her health care provider, a telecommuting arrangement would be expected to accomplish? In other words, do you understand their position as to how and why telecommuting would be helpful? (You don't have to agree with it, but you ought to at least be able to comprehend it.)
STEP TWO: Assess the job
Not every job is suited for telecommuting. If the employee assembles cars in a factory or waits on customers at a retail store, the work can't be done from home. On the other hand, many jobs can be done just as well from home -- maybe even better. You need to know which type of job you're dealing with.
No. 4: Is the employee's job the type that requires an onsite presence, or can it be done about as easily and well from a remote location? Be sure to take into account any need for work-related travel. In addition to manufacturing and retail jobs, many supervisory jobs may preclude telecommuting because of the need for the supervisor to monitor performance, to set an example for the employees, and to be immediately available to any employees needing help. On the other hand, employees whose work is primarily done on a computer or phone with minimal need for in-person interaction -- researchers, IT people, analysts, writers, for example -- may be able to do just fine from a home setting.
Of course, many jobs require a mix of "face time" and "quiet time," during which the employee can work remotely. Whether this type of job can be adapted for someone who needs telecommuting as a reasonable accommodation will depend on how important the "face time" is, and what percentage of the work week the employee needs to telecommute.
No. 5: If the employee works remotely, will it be possible for the employer to adequately monitor the employee's punctuality, industry, and quality of work? This is obviously a very big deal.
STEP THREE: Assess the individual employee
If the job lends itself to telecommuting, then you will have to assess the ability of the particular employee to telecommute.
No. 6: Does the employee have the necessary "infrastructure" at home? Does she have fast internet, peace and quiet, an ability to maintain confidentiality where necessary (by use of a VPN, for example), reliable phone service, a decent laptop computer, electricity, etc? If the employee does not have certain essential equipment or service at home, are you willing to provide it to her at company expense?
No. 7: Does the employee work effectively with minimal supervision? You don't want to be paying your employee to surf internet porn or watch TV all day. Has this employee proven that she meets deadlines and fulfills her other responsibilities whether or not anyone is watching? If not, do you have a way to provide effective "remote" supervision?
No. 8: If the employee is non-exempt, can you trust her to accurately post her time, and to limit herself to an eight-hour workday unless she gets your prior permission to work more? You still have to comply with the Fair Labor Standards Act, so you don't want a "super-de-duper-dedicated" non-exempt telecommuter to be putting in 16-hour days while claiming only a standard eight-hour day because she loves you and the company so much. You also don't want telecommuters to be claiming eight-hour days of work when they really spent two and a half hours working, plus three hours at Amazon and live-streaming QVC, one hour watching The Young and the Restless, and an hour and a half taking the kids from school to Little League and walking the dog.
(If the employee is exempt, this amount of goofing off would be a concern for other reasons, but it's not an FLSA concern because you would have to pay the employee for the full workweek anyway, and you don't have to worry about overtime. Just make sure she's really exempt!)
STEP FOUR: Make your final decision
No. 9: In your opinion, could telecommuting possibly resolve the work-related issue created by the employee's disability or medical condition? If not, you don't have to allow it. But if it might, then move on to No. 10.
No. 10: Decision time! Now that you've considered and confirmed the employee's medical condition, assessed the job, assessed the individual employee's equipment, integrity, and work ethic, and assessed whether telecommuting could arguably resolve the problem created by the employee's disability, do you believe that telecommuting could actually work? If so, go for it. If not, be sure to suggest and consider other accommodations, and thoroughly document the reasons you decided that telecommuting would not work.
UPDATE (8:39 a.m. EST): Six more weeks of winter. Boo!
Image Credits: Laptop with Zsa Zsa by me. "Genius at work" from flickr, Creative Commons license, by Jan Kalab, Punxsutawney Phil billboard by Eddie~S.
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010