EDITOR’S NOTE: This article initially appeared in HR Daily Advisor.
Brittany Pietsch, a former account executive at Cloudflare, recently gained viral attention by sharing a nine-minute video of her termination on TikTok. Anticipating the termination after her colleague's dismissal half an hour earlier, Pietsch titled the video, POV: You’re about to get laid off. Enjoy the trauma! :)
In the video, two company representatives who were unfamiliar to Pietsch opened the meeting by stating her termination was due to her failure to meet expectations after an evaluation of 2023 performance. Pietsch quickly interjected, disputing the company’s assessment of her performance. She emphasized her brief four-month tenure (including a three-month ramp-up period that preceded the holiday season), asserted that she had the highest activity on her team (despite closing zero deals) and expressed surprise at her termination given that she had received nothing but positive feedback from her manager, who was notably absent from the meeting. The company representatives, however, did not provide specifics regarding where Pietsch’s performance fell short.
The incident ignited public discourse on the proper way to handle employee terminations and sparked a new trend among Gen-Z employees of recording and sharing their terminations on social media platforms.
A Note to Gen Z: Don’t Do It for The ‘Gram
The familiar disclaimer, "This call is being recorded for quality and training purposes," is there for good reason. In many states, it is illegal to record calls if you do not have the consent of the other parties on the line. And even if you are in a one-party-consent state, the other party may be in a two-party-consent state. If so, does your jurisdiction control or does the jurisdiction of the other party?
At best, you may be putting your future employability at risk in exchange for views. At worst, you could be charged with a crime, slapped with a lawsuit, or both. Don’t let the intrusive thoughts win! The allure of views on social media should not override the potential professional and legal consequences.
A Note to Employers: Navigate the Recording Trend Wisely
Employers might be tempted to respond to this trend by implementing policies that prohibit employees from recording workplace conversations. This may get them in hot water with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), which has held that, in certain circumstances, an employee recording in the workplace can be legally protected activity under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). This means that employees, whether unionized or not, have the right to take action to help protect, enhance or improve the terms and conditions of employment for themselves and their co-workers.
Employers who interfere with or restrain employees’ Section 7 rights may be found to have committed an unfair labor practice. Thus, for most employers, policies prohibiting recording should apply only to information that is not protected under Section 7, such as information about customers, vendors, suppliers or corporate trade secrets.
Best Practices for Employers to Avoid Viral Controversies
With that said, below are some tips for employers seeking to avoid “going viral.”
- Avoid surprises with timely (and documented!) performance discussions. Even before an issue arises, employees should have a clear understanding of what is expected of them. If they fail to meet those expectations, the manager should let them know. So often, well-intentioned managers focus primarily on providing positive feedback to their reports and postpone the constructive criticism until the annual review, if at all. Employees should receive timely constructive feedback. And, because underperforming employees don’t always listen to the feedback they are given, it’s even more important to contemporaneously document these discussions. No employee being terminated for poor performance should be surprised.
- Do it in private and (preferably) in person. With the exception of remote employees or where there may be a safety concern, don’t terminate an employee over the phone, via letter, via email or via phone call. Do it in person if you can. Ideally, the employee’s manager and an HR representative (always have a witness!) should deliver the message in private. If the employee has a conflict with a particular coworker or manager, that person should not be involved in the meeting. In-person terminations may reduce the possibility of a recorded meeting, although there are no guarantees.
- Keep your communication brief and non-argumentative. Prepare a brief summary of the points that you will need to convey during the termination. Give employees time in the meeting to process the decision and ask questions, but do not be drawn into bargaining or arguments. Any employee concerns raised should be listened to and investigated, but not debated.
- Protect company confidential information. If an employee feels bitter about their termination, they might do much worse than embarrass your company on TikTok. Right before or during your meeting with the employee, terminate their access to your company’s electronic systems, such as their employee email account.
- Consult your friendly neighborhood employment lawyer before you act. As always, employers should seek legal advice to assess the risk of terminating an employee, especially those employees who have been with the company for a long time; have recently complained about an issue in the workplace; have recently returned from a leave of absence that is covered under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), a state leave law or because of a medical condition; or who belong to a protected class. State anti-discrimination laws vary, but under federal law, protected classes include race, color, religion or creed, national origin, age (40 and older), disability, veteran status and sex (which includes pregnancy and pregnancy-related conditions, gender identity and sexual orientation). Preventive legal guidance will help to ensure compliance with employment laws and minimize legal risks.
In this new era of viral job terminations, caution is the latest trend. Employees, protect your professional reputation; employers, adopt these best practices to avoid making the wrong kind of headlines!
- Attorney
Joyce is a dedicated and compassionate employment defense attorney focused on counseling and advising employers on a broad range of issues in the workplace, including discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and wrongful ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010