Nothing you wouldn't already have figured out.
This is not the most exciting employment law news, but the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has issued some updates to its technical assistance on COVID-19. According to an EEOC media release, the changes were prompted by the end of the public health emergency.
You'll be happy to know that the changes are not radical.
Here are the highlights, with references to the relevant section of the technical assistance. If you are still having COVID-related issues in your workplace, you might want to read the full guidance, which is available here. The updates that the EEOC thought were particularly important are in bold below.
24 updates from the EEOC on COVID-19
- If an employee calls in sick, it's still ok to ask whether the employee has COVID or symptoms of COVID. (A.1)
- Employers should continue to rely on guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention about COVID symptoms. (A.2)
- Generally, taking an employee's temperature is a "medical examination," which means it can't be done unless "job-related and consistent with business necessity." But if CDC or other public health guidance says a fever is "a possible indication of infection," then it's all right to take the employee's temperature. (A.3)
- If CDC guidance recommends that employees with COVID or COVID symptoms stay home for a certain period of time, it's all right for the employer to require its employees to stay out of work for the recommended period. (A.4)
- It's ok for an employer to ask all employees entering the workplace whether they've been diagnosed with COVID or tested for COVID. If consistent with "CDC-recommended isolation protocols," the employer can bar employees with COVID or COVID symptoms from the workplace. (A.8)
- If the employer wants to require all employees, or particular employees, to be tested for COVID or to have their temperatures taken, these measures must be "job-related and consistent with business necessity." Again, let the CDC be your guide. (A.9)
- You can't ask an employee whether his or her family members have COVID or symptoms of COVID. That would violate the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. (A.10)
- If an employee refuses to cooperate with the employer's lawful COVID-screening measures, the employer can require that employee to stay out of the workplace. But the EEOC recommends asking what the concern is. If confidentiality, then the employer may be able to get cooperation by reassuring the employee that medical information will remain confidential. If the employee needs a reasonable accommodation, the employer should discuss that with the employee and consider providing it. (A.11)
- If an employee reports feeling sick at work, it's ok to ask whether the employee has COVID or COVID symptoms and to take whatever actions are recommended by the CDC. (A.12)
- It's ok to keep an employee's COVID-related medical information in the employee's regular medical file (with non-COVID-related medical information) -- which, as I'm sure you all know, must be kept separate from the employee's personnel file. (B.1)
- It's ok to screen applicants for COVID symptoms after a conditional offer of employment has been made, but even before if the employer requires it of everybody entering the worksite. (C.1)
- It's ok to provide a temporary reasonable accommodation for COVID while figuring out what kind of long-term accommodation will be needed. (D.7)
- It's ok to invite employees to request reasonable accommodations that they may need when they return to the workplace. (D.8)
- Pandemic-related conditions (for example, supply chain issues) may be taken into account when determining whether a particular reasonable accommodation would be an "undue hardship," but if so, the employer and employee should work together to try to find alternative accommodations. (D.10, 11)
- Reasonable accommodations for long COVID might include "a quiet workspace, use of noise cancelling or white noise devices, and uninterrupted worktime to address brain fog; alternative lighting and reducing glare to address headaches; rest breaks to address joint pain or shortness of breath; a flexible schedule or telework to address fatigue; and removal of 'marginal functions' that involve physical exertion to address shortness of breath." (D.19)
- The end of the public health emergency does not mean that employers can automatically quit making reasonable accommodations that may still be needed. (D.20)
- When providing harassment training, employers should consider covering harassment of employees who are still wearing masks or taking other COVID-related precautions. The training can also cover harassment of employees who have been exempted from getting vaccinated due to a religious objection. (E.2)
- Pregnant employees who don't want to be vaccinated against COVID should be treated the same as those who don't get vaccinated because of disabilities or religious beliefs. (K.2)
- Employers can still offer unlimited incentives to employees to be vaccinated against COVID, as long as the employer or its agent is not the one administering the vaccines. Vaccine information must be kept confidential. (K.16)
- Long COVID will be a "disability" within the meaning of the Americans with Disabilities Act if it "substantially limits" a "major life activity" or "major bodily function," even if it lasts only a few months. But if the symptoms are more like cold or flu symptoms and "resolve in a matter of weeks," then long COVID is not a disability. You have probably figured this out already, but determining whether a case of long COVID is a disability will require an "individualized assessment." (N.2, N.4)
- A person who has or had in the past long COVID can also have a "record of" a disability or be "regarded as" having a disability under the ADA. (N.5, N.6)
- It's ok to request medical documentation before granting a request for reasonable accommodation of long COVID. (N.11)
- An employer can voluntarily accommodate long COVID even if it isn't required to do so. Duh. (N.12)
That's it! Thanks to the EEOC for unexciting guidance. Boring is good.
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010