Sober up, folks! Here we go.
With the legalization of marijuana and cannabis products in so many states, dealing with substance abuse in the workplace has become ridiculously complicated.
![](assets/htmlimages/Wine-Marijuana.AdobeStock_831956907.jpg)
This is the first of a two-part post. Today, I'll share with you five "fun" facts about drugs and alcohol in the workplace. Next week, I'll post about how employers can or should put it all together.
Fun Fact No. 1: It's ok to ban illegal drugs. In the immortal words of South Park's Mr. Mackey, "Drugs are bad. Don't use drugs, m'kay?"*
*I could not provide a link because everything I found was Not Suitable for Work. Over the long weekend, you can do a search on your personal device. :-)
Employers can generally test employees "without cause" for illegal drugs. In other words, they can do random, universal, or post-offer testing. If you are in a state where marijuana is still illegal and if you're a private sector employer, you should be able to continue including marijuana in your testing panel. (Assuming you want to.) If someone tests positive post-offer, then you can generally refuse to hire them. If a current employee tests positive, you can generally fire them. But be sure to check the laws in your state before you act.
If you're in a state where marijuana is legal, forget about what I just said. Except the part about checking your state laws.
Fun Fact No. 2: You can generally take action against an employee who uses legal prescription drugs without a valid prescription. Let's say your employee is stressed out one morning and "borrows" his wife's Valium. Then he gets to work and is unlucky enough to be called in for a random drug test. (No wonder he's stressed.) Since Valium is legal with a prescription, he should be excused upon presenting a valid prescription. But of course, this guy can't, because the Valium wasn't his. His wife was the one with the prescription, not him. In many, if not most, jurisdictions you would be able to fire this employee for using a legal drug in an illegal manner. I'm not saying I would, but you probably could if you wanted to.
![](assets/htmlimages/Man%20Stoned.AdobeStock_75218673.jpg)
Fun Fact No. 3: Alcohol is in a glass -- I mean, class -- by itself. Alcohol is legal, of course, assuming you're not under age. With the exception of employees who are covered by federal laws that require testing for alcohol (such as the regulation of the U.S. Department of Transportation for individuals with commercial drivers licenses), employers can test employees for alcohol only if they have "cause." This means that you can't do random or universal testing for alcohol.
However, you can test for alcohol if you have reason to believe that the employee is under the influence. For example, coming to work smelling like a saloon, or stumbling and bumbling and slurring. Or, perhaps, the employee ran over a co-worker with a forklift going 55 mph while belting out "How Dry I Am." Or the employee is returning to work after alcohol rehabilitation and the employee's therapist has recommended periodic testing as part of the therapeutic process.
These weird rules apply to alcohol because, under the Americans with Disabilities Act, alcoholism is a disability, and an alcohol test is a "medical examination" under the ADA. And an employer cannot require employees to undergo medical examinations unless the examinations are "job-related and consistent with business necessity."
ADA coverage also means that you can't treat an alcoholic employee more harshly than you would a "similarly situated" non-alcoholic. For example, if everybody in the office gets trashed at your annual Christmas party, you can't single out the alcoholic employee for disciplinary action. The would be discrimination based on a disability (alcoholism). Also, under the ADA, you may have to make some reasonable accommodations for alcohol addiction. For the most part, this would consist of things like allowing the employee to take time off from work to go to 12-step meetings or for appointments with counselors. On the other hand, the ADA doesn't require you to "accommodate" the employee's need to keep a fifth of Jack Daniels in her desk drawer, or to tipple throughout the workday. (Unless you let your non-alcoholic employees do the same.)
![](assets/htmlimages/Drunk%20Passed%20Out%20Party.AdobeStock_128741432.jpg)
Fun Fact No. 4: The status of marijuana under federal law may be changing soon. As most of you probably know, marijuana is still an illegal drug under federal law and has been since the 1970s. It is a Schedule I substance, meaning that the federal government says there is no currently accepted medical use for it, and the risks of using it are high. That, in turn, means that a marijuana user -- even a medical marijuana user -- has no protection under the ADA because the ADA does not protect "current users of illegal drugs." No protection against discrimination based on the marijuana use, and no right to reasonable accommodation. But that may be changing. In May, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration issued proposed regulations that would reclassify marijuana as a Schedule III substance, meaning that it has some legitimate uses. The comment period on the proposed regs closed on July 22, so a Final Rule rescheduling marijuana may be issued as early as the end of this year.
If marijuana is reclassified as a Schedule III drug, it will still be illegal for recreational use. Even where medical use is concerned, according to this article, "Schedule 3 drugs must be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), prescribed by a doctor, and distributed by a pharmacy." But the use of medical marijuana with a valid prescription after FDA approval presumably would make it like any other prescription medication where the ADA is concerned.
![](assets/htmlimages/Marijuana%202.AdobeStock_135635746.jpg)
Fun Fact No. 5: Controlling use of legal drugs in the workplace is complicated. I'll talk more about this next week, but an issue that employers frequently raise with legal marijuana and with other legal drugs is, "Can we do anything about that?" You might have jobs where the use of legal medications could have an impact on safety, or on an employee's ability to competently perform the job. Let's put marijuana to the side for a minute. Suppose your employee has a back injury and is taking prescription opiates. It's his prescription, not his wife's. Perfectly legit.
But you're concerned because he starts making dumb mistakes with his work, falling asleep at his desk, and seeming dizzy when walking around. Can you do anything about this?
Tune in next week and find out! We'll have more on marijuana then, too.
And have a great Labor Day weekend!
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Robert L. Ortbals Jr.
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Katie M. Rhoten
- Paul Ryan
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010