The beginning of July conjures many images for Americans – barbecues, picnics, fireworks. But for many employers, July also triggered preparation for the annual EEO-1 Report filing. Until this year, covered employers were required to file their reports no later than September 30, and the data submitted had to be from any pay period in July, August, or September.
But in 2016, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission announced changes to the EEO-1 Report. As a result, employers have a reprieve this summer! There is no EEO-1 Report filing deadline in 2017.
Before you get too excited, though, remember that employers must file “new and improved” EEO-1 Reports by March 31, 2018, with compensation information for 2017. The new reporting requirements mandate that covered employers provide information on total compensation and total hours worked by race, ethnicity, gender, EEO-1 category, and designated salary bands. Here's a sample of the new report.
As we have previously discussed, the revised EEO-1 Report requires that employers provide substantially more information to the government, and this additional information is intended to assist the government in ferreting out employers committing pay discrimination. Even though there is some uncertainty regarding whether the new EEO-1 Report will be required by the Trump Administration, employers should be proactive and prepare to comply with these new requirements unless and until the requirements are officially withdrawn.
With that in mind, what can and should employers do to ensure they are prepared to submit the additional data (from a pay period in October, November, or December 2017) by March 2018?
First, employers should assess any potential logistical issues.
⇥
- Do you have more than 100 employees, triggering the use of the revised reporting form? If an employer is not a federal contractor and has less than 100 employees, then the reporting requirements do not apply at all. If the employer is a federal contractor and has between 50 and 99 employees, then it should continue to use the old version of the report without the “enhanced” data reporting requirements.
⇥
- How will "total hours worked" for exempt employees be reported if the employer has records of hours worked? Employers have two options: (1) They may choose to report a "proxy" of 40 hours per week for full-time exempt employees and 20 hours per week for part-time exempt employees, or (2) they may report the actual number of hours worked.
⇥
- What “snapshot” of your workforce will you use for reporting purposes? Employers have the option of using any time from October 1 through December 31. However, to take advantage of the annual accounting and tax reporting mechanisms already in place, most employers are likely to use December 31 so that they will not have to run entirely different reports for total compensation. If an employer selects any other date, it will need to calculate total compensation for a different one-year period.
⇥
- Ensure that you can separate your employees into the different salary bands designated by the EEOC:
$19,239 and under
$19,240 - $24,439
$24,440 - $30,679
$30,680 - $38,999
$39,000 - $49,919
$49,920 - $62,919
$62,920 - $80,079
$80,080 - $101,919
$101,920 - $128,959
$128,960 - $163,799
$163,800 - $207,999
$208,000 and over
⇥
- Is all of the data required by the report “housed” in the same system, or will you need to combine data from multiple sources? For example, is race, ethnicity, and gender stored in the same place as hours worked or total compensation? If not, additional programming may be required to deliver the information accurately and efficiently.
⇥
- Have you collected race, ethnicity, and gender information from all of your employees? If not, you should consider issuing a voluntary self-identification survey to capture missing information.
⇥
- Do you have questions about how to file the EEO-1 Report? You may email the EEOC at suggestionbox@eeoc.gov for technical assistance.
After the logistical issues are ironed out, employers should turn to strategic issues to help minimize the likelihood that the government will target them for investigation regarding their pay practices. I do not believe that this report will be a practical enforcement tool due to the divergent jobs in each EEO-1 category, as well as the significant differences between individual employers. Nonetheless, there are some recommended steps to reduce your chances of receiving a Commissioner’s charge, or being selected for a compliance review by the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs if you are a federal contractor.
⇥
- Examine your EEO-1 categories. Are all job titles appropriately classified? You don’t want your data unnecessarily skewed because you are including employees in the wrong groups. As job duties change over time, so too may the proper EEO-1 category. This is an excellent time to review the assignment of each job title to an EEO-1 category.
⇥
- Conduct a privileged compensation analysis. Have you determined whether pay differences are explained by legitimate factors such as seniority, time in job, etc.? If not, it would be wise to find them and make any necessary corrections before the data is set at the end of 2017.
⇥
- Consider performing a practice run at completing the report before the deadline of March 31, 2018. This would allow you to discover potential complications or problems with your internal data and reporting process. Preparing a draft report would also provide an opportunity to see how the data may be viewed by the government. For example, are the top salary bands in each EEO-1 category comprised of white males, or is there good distribution among the races and genders throughout each EEO-1 category?
Even though a lot is up in the air politically, and even though March 31, 2018, seems a long way off, federal contractors should not delay preparation to comply with the new reporting requirements. Because of the volume and nature of information being requested, contractors are unlikely to be able to "turn on a dime" based on future political developments that may or may not occur. Do not wait until the last minute to consider these issues and develop an action plan for compliance.
- Partner
Cara advises employers on ways to avoid litigation and has defended employers in cases involving virtually every aspect of the employment relationship, including discrimination, harassment, and retaliation claims and various ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010