How much can you do - and not do - about your employees' personal appearance and grooming? Take this quiz and find out! As usual, I'll have the answers at the end, so if you get one wrong, no one but you will know.
QUESTION 1: If I operate in a jurisdiction that doesn't have a law against appearance discrimination, I can make any rules about appearance and grooming that I want.
TRUE
FALSE
QUESTION 2: My employees are required by OSHA to wear masks on the job. The masks are no good unless there is a proper seal around the employee's mouth and nose. Since facial hair prevents a good seal from forming, we have a no-beard policy. I have one employee who is Sikh and wears a beard for religious reasons. What should I do?
A. Let him keep his beard and pray that the mask will work without the proper seal.
B. Tell him he has to shave the beard off or lose his job.
C. Meet with him and explain that the mask is required by OSHA and the safety rationale for the rule. Talk with him about reasonable accommodations, which might include use of a different type of mask that works with a beard, or transfer to another position that doesn't require use of a mask. After you've talked and perhaps consulted with vendors or safety experts, make a determination of what to do that won't violate the law or endanger his safety while accommodating his beliefs as much as you can.
How much can you do - and not do - about your employees' personal appearance and grooming? Take this quiz and find out! As usual, I'll have the answers at the end, so if you get one wrong, no one but you will know.
QUESTION 1: If I operate in a jurisdiction that doesn't have a law against appearance discrimination, I can make any rules about appearance and grooming that I want.
TRUE
FALSE
QUESTION 2: My employees are required by OSHA to wear masks on the job. The masks are no good unless there is a proper seal around the employee's mouth and nose. Since facial hair prevents a good seal from forming, we have a no-beard policy. I have one employee who is Sikh and wears a beard for religious reasons. What should I do?
A. Let him keep his beard and pray that the mask will work without the proper seal.
B. Tell him he has to shave the beard off or lose his job.
C. Meet with him and explain that the mask is required by OSHA and the safety rationale for the rule. Talk with him about reasonable accommodations, which might include use of a different type of mask that works with a beard, or transfer to another position that doesn't require use of a mask. After you've talked and perhaps consulted with vendors or safety experts, make a determination of what to do that won't violate the law or endanger his safety while accommodating his beliefs as much as you can.
QUESTION 3: I have an employee with terrible body odor. As far as I know, it's not because of any medical condition -- I think she just doesn't bathe or do her laundry often enough. Several employees have come to me and complained about it. What should I do?
A. If you say something you'll hurt her feelings, so grin and bear it, and tell your employees to do the same.
B. Get one other trustworthy person, preferably from Human Resources, and meet with her privately. As gently as possible, let her know that her odor is creating a problem in the workplace. If she offers a medical explanation, listen with an open mind. You may have to make reasonable accommodations if there is a medical cause, but before you do that, you should be allowed to ask for a doctor's note and permission to communicate directly with her doctor. If there is no medical issue, then simply tell her that she needs to address the problem.
C. Anonymously leave a gift basket of deodorant on her chair, and hope she takes the hint.
QUESTION 4: We are a conservative office. We've had a lot of retirements in the past few years, and to replace them, we've hired some young "hipsters." The kids are working out really well, but many of them have facial piercings and tattoos. We've told them to wear long sleeves that cover the "tats" on their arms and shoulders, but we have a few who have tattoos on their hands, necks, and even faces. And of course the nose and lip rings show, too! What can we do? I don't want to lose these good employees, but our office needs to project a professional image.
A. Tell your "hipsters" in a nice way that they must leave the nose and lip rings at home and that "tats" must be covered by sleeves and necklines as much as possible. With the tats that can't be covered up, choose your battles and act accordingly. Reasonably accommodate any employee whose tattoos or piercings have a religious basis.
B. Think young! Let the tats and nose rings run wild!
C. Call your retirees and try to talk them into coming back to work.
QUESTION 5: We are also a conservative office. We require all employees to dress in professional attire, meaning suits (with pants) and ties for men, and dresses or suits with skirts, heels, and pantyhose, for women. Men are expected to have their hair neatly trimmed, above the collar, and we don't allow beards or mustaches. Women are expected to have their hair neatly groomed (any length is ok) and wear makeup to work. Recently, somebody told me that our policy might not pass legal muster. Are they right?
A. Yes
B. No
ANSWERS:
⇥
- FALSE. Even if your jurisdiction doesn't prohibit appearance discrimination per se, you may violate other anti-discrimination laws based on your appearance code and the way that you apply it. Employees sometimes fail to meet employer appearance guidelines because of race, sex, national origin, religion, or disability.
⇥
- C, of course. This is a religious accommodation issue and should be treated as such. However, if the beard would cause your company to be in violation of OSHA requirements and if no alternative to the mask is available, then you would probably be justified in transferring the employee to another position or, if that isn't possible, terminating his employment.
⇥
- B, of course.
⇥
- A, for most employers. If employees are wearing tattoos and nose rings as a matter of personal style, then you can enforce your appearance code -- unless you are in a jurisdiction that prohibits appearance discrimination per se. In that case, B would be a better answer.
⇥
- YES. Some jurisdictions, including New York City, prohibit gender-specific dress and appearance codes. Even if you're not in one of those jurisdictions, requiring only women to do their hair and wear makeup might be a form of sex discrimination or unlawful stereotyping. It's probably better these days to simply require "professional business attire" without going into detail. Ninety-nine percent of your work force will know exactly what that means. But you're leaving yourself a bit of "wiggle room" if you someday have a woman who wants to wear pantsuits (who ever heard of such a thing?) or a transgender employee who wants to dress according to the gender with which he or she identifies -- or if you move your office to NYC.
As you can see, we will do anything to avoid having to talk about the election! But in case you missed it, here are our 2016 Employer's Guide to Employee Voting Rights and my comparison of Hillary Clinton's and Donald Trump's views on labor and employment law issues. Hang in there - it will be over soon!
And then we'll really be in trouble.
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010