Ah, February! The month of love! Of course, if you're a lawyer, you see the worst of humanity and never get to hear about true, faithful, honorable, self-sacrificial love -- sexual harassment is as close to "love" as we ever get. (See, you thought lawyers were just jerks - now you feel sorry for us!)
So, in honor of St. Valentine's Day, this is the best I can do. Here are two recent sexual harassment cases, each with a moral for employers. That's two cases, and two morals.
Hey! Did you know that 2 is almost 3, and that 3 squared = 9? And three 9s = 9-9-9? I miss Herman Cain!
Here comes Doctor Love! In the first case, the plaintiff, a nurse, had an affair with a married doctor. She admitted that, while the affair was going on, she told everyone in the world about it, and she and the doctor had some "encounters" in the workplace. He promised that he was going to leave his wife, but finally admitted that he'd been lying about that, so the plaintiff told him to hit the road. (Or, did she?)
The plaintiff now told everyone in the world that the relationship was over, but her beloved doctor, holding fast to the hope that he could continue to have his cake and eat it, too, kept sending her romantic text messages and trying to touch her. As the court tactfully put it, "As a result, she sometimes avoided him at the office." (Emphasis added.) She apparently had an opportunity to transfer to another department away from him but turned it down.
Finally, the plaintiff sent a letter to her employer saying she wanted to continue working with "Doctor Love" but only in a professional way. She said that she wanted to be treated "as any other employee . . . no better and no worse."
The employer brought in an attorney to investigate her allegations of "sexual harassment," and then offered her two choices: quit, or be fired for disruptive behavior and having sex on the employer's premises.
The nurse chose to be fired (the doctor was fired, too), and she brought a number of claims against the employer, including sexual harassment, sex discrimination, and retaliation. The court granted summary judgment to the employer, saying that the doctor's post-breakup text messages were not objectively harassing even though they might have been annoying and "distressing." (The decision quotes the messages, and they really do seem fairly tame in the context of a breakup.) There was no retaliation, the court said, because a "plan" to get rid of her was not an adverse employment action. She lost on her other claims because she didn't even address them in her response.
MORAL: I actually have two morals from this case: a moral for women, and a moral for men. (Roles may be changed as appropriate.)
Ladies, if you get mixed up with a married man who lies to you about getting a divorce, call him a cad and dump him, but don't accuse him of sexual harassment if he didn't sexually harass you. And by no means sue your employer, an innocent bystander, for the consequences of your folly. If you don't care about doing the right thing, care about the fact that you will lose your case because all of your co-workers, who know you were having a consensual affair, will testify against you. Better to shake the dust from your feet and move on. Remember how happy Kirstie Alley was after she forgot about that rotten George Segal and married John Travolta? Do that.
Gentlemen, I've said this before and won't ever stop: 99.9 percent* of sexual harassment lawsuits result from a failed extramarital affair. Like our "Doctor Love," by having an affair at work you may make yourself vulnerable to a lawsuit, lose your job, and have to drop out of the presidential race (or at least have a severe gender gap in support for your candidacy). You will also have some explaining to do at home. Always remember that "a relationship is like a porcelain nail. If it breaks, you can put it back together again but it will never be the same unless you make a commitment and don't sleep with nurses!"
*Completely made-up statistic, but true nonetheless.
Even an exotic dancer has the right to say no. In our second case, the plaintiff worked at a convenience store and was aggressively pursued by her store manager. When she declined his advances, he cut back on her work hours, allegedly "forcing" her to get a second job as a part-time exotic dancer. His advances and retaliatory behavior escalated, her complaints to higher management were ignored, and she was finally fired for taking money out of the cash register (she said she was only making change) and closing the store for 10-15 minutes (she said it was necessary for safety reasons).
After she sued the employer for sexual harassment, the employer tried to argue that her boss's bad behavior was based on her "exotic dancer" job, not sexual harassment. Nice try, said the court. First, there was evidence that the behavior began before she got the job as an exotic dancer. (Remember she said she took the dancing job because he cut back her work hours at the store after she rejected his advances.) Second, his behavior was clearly based on her sex, whether it started after or before she she became a dancer.
However, the defendant did get summary judgment on her state-law tort claims because, under Maryland law, sexual harassment is not in the course and scope of employment. (In many states, these claims would also have been allowed to go to trial.)
MORAL: I have two morals from this case, too.
To all sleazebags, nobody -- but nobody -- is "fair game." Don't think that somebody's part-time or past employment, style of dress, choice of significant others, or sexual past means they're "available." Even if she's slept with everyone at your office and you can definitively prove it (doubtful, but just for the sake of argument), she still has the right to say no to you. If she says no, let it go, and treat her the same way you would treat any employee that you aren't trying to hit on.
To employers, even employees with a "history" can have valid complaints of sexual harassment. Don't ignore or minimize harassment complaints for any reason, including but not limited to any of the reasons listed in the preceding paragraph. Take all allegations of harassment seriously, respond to them promptly, investigate them thoroughly, and take the action that is appropriate under the circumstances.
Now go out and buy your true love some flowers (from a florist, not the supermarket), and have a happy Valentine's Day!
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010