Maybe it's just me, but workplace harassment issues seem to come in waves -- I'll go months, or even a year, without an issue, and then WHAM! everybody has a "situation," or at least they need to get their preventive training done.
Right now, we're in a bit of a "flash flood," so I thought it might be a good time to review the basics, with some updates.
WHAT ARE THE FIVE HARASSMENT "MUST HAVES" FOR ANY EMPLOYER?
1. An effective no-harassment policy
2. Regular, high-quality harassment training
3. Prompt, thorough, and fair investigations of harassment allegations
4. Appropriate action based on whether the allegation is substantiated
5. No retaliation
What are the "must haves" for an effective no-harassment policy?
Here are mine:
1. It should cover all forms of unlawful harassment (for example, race, national origin, religion, age, and disability) and not just sexual harassment.
2. It should be written in plain English at a level that your least educated, least literate (short of being literally illiterate) employee will understand. At the very least, it should explain the following:
*The types of behavior that violate the policy, and the penalties,
*Where to go if the employee believes that he or she is being harassed, or that a co-worker is being harassed, and
*That no one making a good-faith complaint of harassment will be punished or penalized in any way for doing so.
3. It should be made available in all of the languages that your employees speak, in which case you may have to have it in "plain Spanish" instead of plain English. Or plain Chinese, or plain Serbo-Croatian. You get the idea.
4. It should designate more than just "chain of command" for reporting a harassment complaint. After all, what if the employee's supervisor is the harasser?
5. If you're a federal contractor, or if you operate in a state that requires it, or if you just want to do it even though you're under no legal obligation, the policy should prohibit harassment based on sexual orientation or gender identity as well as the "traditional" characteristics.
6. Employees should be required to sign for their copies of the policy, either with pen and ink or electronically. The signed acknowledgements should be stored in a secure place so that you use them in your defense if you get sued or get an EEOC charge.
7. If you have employees who are illiterate, go over the policy with them orally (in a language that they understand) and get an appropriate acknowledgement from them, too.
(There may be additional requirements based on the laws of the states where you do business.)
What are the "must haves" for harassment training?
1. Do it every 12-18 months, whether you need it or not. (That last part is a joke - you do need it that often.)
2. The first time you train your managers, have a session of about 2 1/2 hours, which covers the policy, some of the applicable law and scary jury verdicts (this helps them pay attention in class, te-he), the types of behaviors that are prohibited and allowed, and how they should handle complaints that they receive. Consider bringing in an employment attorney for this session (or using your in-house counsel, if you have it). Make sure that new hires get the training soon after they start work. (To control costs, you can consider videotaping your first session and using the replay version for later hires.)
3. After they've had their first "intensive" management session, the managers can graduate to short refreshers of about an hour every 12-18 months.
4. If you have "quasi-supervisors" -- group leads, foremen, team leaders, assistant supervisors, working supervisors, etc. -- either include them in the management training, or give them their own session but use the "management" version of the training. Even though people in these job classifications aren't true "management," they are often viewed that way by the other employees, who may not understand all of these workplace technicalities. Which means that "quasi-supervisors" are likely to get harassment complaints. You don't want them to mess this up.
5. Send everybody else through a "non-management" version of harassment training (with refreshers every 12-18 months), which covers (a) what behaviors are prohibited and the consequences, (b) how to report a harassment complaint, and (c) retaliation. These sessions shouldn't be more than 45 minutes to an hour, unless you operate in a state that requires more.
6. If you have a contingent workforce (such as temporaries who are technically employed by an agency), do still require them to go through your harassment training. Yes, even if the temp agency already provides the training! Temps are frequently victims of harassment by employees, because temps have the lowest status and some (bad) employees think they can get away with it. The temps are often afraid to report harassment for fear of being released from their assignments or not becoming eligible for hire. Similarly, independent contractors and student interns should be required to undergo your training.
7. If you have a multilingual workforce, make sure that whatever training you provide is meaningful to your non-English-speakers. It should be easy to get a trainer who is fluent in Spanish. With other languages, you may have to be more creative, but you should still be able to get it done.
What are the "must haves" for a prompt, thorough, and fair investigation?
It should be prompt, thorough, and fair.
(Kidding - come back next week, when we'll talk about investigations!)
. . . AND ALSO OF INTEREST . . .
Speaking of plain language, everybody needs to read this: "So you've reported an accident to OSHA. What happens next, and how do you respond?" by David Smith of our Atlanta office. Even if you aren't a safety geek, you'll feel like one by the time you're done. (And I mean that in a good way.)
- Partner
Robin has more than 30 years' experience counseling employers and representing them before government agencies and in employment litigation involving Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with ...
Robin Shea has 30 years' experience in employment litigation, including Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act (including the Amendments Act).
Continue Reading
Subscribe
Contributors
- William A. "Zan" Blue, Jr.
- Obasi Bryant
- Kenneth P. Carlson, Jr.
- James M. Coleman
- Cara Yates Crotty
- Lara C. de Leon
- Christopher R. Deubert
- Joyce M. Dos Santos
- Colin Finnegan
- Steven B. Katz
- Ellen C. Kearns
- F. Damon Kitchen
- David C. Kurtz
- Angelique Groza Lyons
- John E. MacDonald
- Kelly McGrath
- Alyssa K. Peters
- Sarah M. Phaff
- David P. Phippen
- William K. Principe
- Sabrina M. Punia-Ly
- Angela L. Rapko
- Rachael Rustmann
- Paul Ryan
- Piyumi M. Samaratunga
- Robin E. Shea
- Kristine Marie Sims
- David L. Smith
- Jill S. Stricklin
- Jack R. Wallace
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010